Last edited by Nelar
Tuesday, July 7, 2020 | History

2 edition of Judicial deliberations found in the catalog.

Judicial deliberations

Mitchel de S. -O. -L"E Lasser

Judicial deliberations

a comparative analysis of judicial transparency and legitimacy

by Mitchel de S. -O. -L"E Lasser

  • 347 Want to read
  • 3 Currently reading

Published by Oxford University Press in Oxford, New York .
Written in English

    Subjects:
  • France. -- Cour de cassation,
  • United States. -- Supreme Court,
  • Court of Justice of the European Communities,
  • Judicial process -- European Union countries,
  • Judicial process -- France,
  • Judicial process -- United States

  • Edition Notes

    StatementMitchel de S.-O.-L"E. Lasser.
    SeriesOxford studies in European law
    Classifications
    LC ClassificationsK7624 .L37 2009
    The Physical Object
    Paginationix, 382 p. ;
    Number of Pages382
    ID Numbers
    Open LibraryOL24124653M
    ISBN 100199575169
    ISBN 109780199575169
    LC Control Number2010275621

    a deeper problem of Judicial Deliberations: its lack of conceptual clarity and the rather scant evidence it provides for some of its bold claims. The concluding part, part 3, makes the case for a 'comparative jurisprudence' approach, suggested some time ago by William Ewald,14 which in my view Judicial Deliberations follows only in name 1.   Questioning Judicial Deliberations Questioning Judicial Deliberations Komrek, Jan Mitchel Lasser's Judicial Deliberations compares the argumentative practices of the French Cour de cassation, the US Supreme Court, and the European Court of Justice (ECJ), and examines how they achieve judicial legitimacy. In this review I firstly question the models of judicial .

      The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) is the most recent court to join the small number of courts that expressly have adopted the judicial deliberations privilege. The privilege, which is well-grounded in “common-law and constitutional jurisprudence and [] precedents,” protects the deliberative processes of a judge from intrusion.   87 Judicial Deliberations, above n 30, It is true that Lasser mentions in a footnote, n 15 on the same page, that ‘this position—as all theoretical positions tend to be—is by no means universally adopted’ and admits that ‘[c]ontemporary mainstream French doctrine therefore does yield academic authors who argue that [jurisprudence] is a true source of law.’.

    1 Judicial Deliberations in the European Court of Human Rights Prof. J.H. (Janneke) Gerards Dept. of Constitutional and Administrative Law, University of Leiden 1 Introduction In his book Judicial Deliberations, Professor Mitchel Lasser has created an intriguing framework for the comparative analysis of judicial discourse. An important finding of the book is that judicial legitimacy is. The Legitimacy of Highest Courts' Rulings: Judicial Deliberations and Beyond ().pdf writen by Nick Huls, Jacco Bomhoff, Maurice Adams: In his Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy (Oxford ), the American-French scholar Mitchel L.


Share this book
You might also like
Sense of direction

Sense of direction

The Humours of whist

The Humours of whist

world of the tiger.

world of the tiger.

Bibliography of telecommunications and regional development

Bibliography of telecommunications and regional development

unknown masterpiece ; Christ in Flanders ; Melmoth reconciled ; The Maranas ; El Verdugo ; Farewell ; The conscript ; A seaside tragedy ; The red house ; The elixir of life

unknown masterpiece ; Christ in Flanders ; Melmoth reconciled ; The Maranas ; El Verdugo ; Farewell ; The conscript ; A seaside tragedy ; The red house ; The elixir of life

Advanced dBASE IV for Windows

Advanced dBASE IV for Windows

Color Me Successful

Color Me Successful

Dunwoody, Georgia historic cemeteries

Dunwoody, Georgia historic cemeteries

Louder

Louder

Memories of a Bradley boyhood

Memories of a Bradley boyhood

new song

new song

Turn west on 23rd

Turn west on 23rd

Judicial deliberations by Mitchel de S. -O. -L"E Lasser Download PDF EPUB FB2

Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Transparency and Legitimacy (Oxford Studies in European Law) 1st Edition by Mitchel De S.-O.-Le. Lasser (Author)5/5(2). Judicial Deliberations compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassation and the US Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability and control, Judicial deliberations book debate and deliberation, and ultimately judicial legitimacy.

Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy (Oxford Studies in European Law) 1st Edition by Mitchel de S.-O.-l'E.

Lasser (Author). Judicial Deliberations - Comparative Law - Law Offers a major comparative study of the judicial reasoning and interpretive processes of civil and common law systems and the European Court of Justice Demonstrates how the ECJ generates legitimacy. Examining the judicial argumentation of the U.S.

Supreme Court and the French Cour de cassation, the book first reorders the traditional comparative understanding of the difference between French civil law and American common law judicial decision-making. It then uses this analysis to offer the first detailed comparative examination of the interpretive practice of the European Court of.

This book compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassation and the United States Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability and control, judicial debate and deliberation, and ultimately judicial legitimacy.

Offers a major comparative study of the judicial reasoning and interpretive processes of civil and common law systems and the European Court of Justice Demonstrates how the ECJ generates legitimacy and transparency through a rigorous argumentative approach Examines judicial argumentation of the US Supreme Court and the French Cour de cassation.

Judicial deliberations book Judicial Deliberations compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassation and the US Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability and control, judicial debate and deliberation, and ultimately judicial : OUP Oxford.

The book is a multidisciplinary contribution to the international debate about the legitimacy of the highest courts’ rulings as well as the concept of judicial leadership and offers a new perspective in the USA versus Europe debate.

It is recommended reading for academics, judges, policymakers, political scientists and students. TY - BOOK. T1 - The legitimacy of highest courts’ rulings. T2 - ‘Judicial deliberations’ and beyond. A2 - Adams, M.

A2 - Bomhoff, J.A. A2 - Huls, N. Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy Mitchel de S.-O.-l'E.

Lasser This book compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassation and the United States Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability and control, judicial debate and deliberation, and ultimately judicial legitimacy.

The book In his Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy (Oxford ), the American-French scholar Mitchel Lasser has, among other things, tried to re-establish the strengths of the French cassation system.

In his book Judicial Deliberations, Professor Mitchel Lasser has created an intriguing framework for the comparative analysis of judicial discourse. An important finding of the book is that judicial le-gitimacy is relative in character.1 Courts use a wide range of argumentative methods and techniques.

* Guy Canivet, Justice of the French Constitutional Council and former President of the French Cour de cassation * Judicial Deliberations is an ambitious, important, and innovative book, which adds greatly to our understanding of particular legal systems, of the ways in which differing configurations of discourse and institutional practice promote core rule-of-law values, and of comparative methodology itself.

In his book Judicial Deliberations, Professor Mitchel Lasser has created an intriguing framework for. the comparative analysis of judici al discourse. An important finding of the book is that.

Mitchel Lasser's Judicial Deliberations compares the argumentative practices of the French Cour de cassation, the US Supreme Court, and the European Court of Justice (ECJ), and examines how they achieve judicial legitimacy.

1 The book's reputation, and the fact that a paperback edition has been published this year, provides justification for the writing of this review five years after. Online shopping for Judicial System from a great selection at Books Store.

Trials and Deliberations: Inside the Jury Room (Trial Practice Series) Jul 1, by Amy Singer and Pat Maloney. Hardcover. $ (7 used & new offers) Unknown Binding. Get this from a library. Judicial deliberations: a comparative analysis of transparency and legitimacy.

[Mitchel de S -O -L'E Lasser] -- The author compares how and why the European Court of Justice the French Cour de cassation and the United States Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability and.

Judicial Deliberations is an ambitious, important, and innovative book, which adds greatly to our understanding of particular legal systems, of the ways in which differing configurations of discourse and institutional practice promote core rule-of-law values, and of comparative methodology itself.

Beautifully written and wide-ranging in scope Reviews: 2. Get this from a library. Judicial deliberations: a comparative analysis of judicial transparency and legitimacy. [Mitchel de S -O -L'E Lasser] -- "Judicial Deliberations" compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassation and the US Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability.

Mind Reading: Judges Can Keep Deliberations to Themselves, Mass. Court Says. By John Gibeaut. December 1,am CST.The judicial systems of France, the United States, and the European Union as represented by the Cour de cassation, Supreme Court, and the European Court of Justice, respectively, take rather different approaches to a series of fundamental debate and deliberation issues.

First, who should be engaged in debates about judicial decision-making?Download Citation | Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Transparency and Legitimacy | This book compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassation, and.